personality test results

A lot of personality tests don't describe me accurately. I came across the similarminds.com website and decided to take some of them.
Here's one:

Factor		low score	high score
Gregariousness	46%	quiet, reclusive	engaging, socially bold
Sociability	58%	withdrawn, hidden	warm, open, inviting
Assertiveness	30%	timid, gunshy	controlling, aggressive
Poise	42%	uneasy around others	socially comfortable
Leadership	30%	stays in background	prefers to lead
Provocativeness	38%	modest, plays it safe	bold, uninhibited, cocky
Self-Disclosure	42%	private, contained	very open and revealing
Talkativeness	42%	quiet, stealthy, invisible	motor mouth, loud
Group Attachment	26%	loves solitude	prefers to be with others
Understanding	58%	insensitive, schizoid	respectful, sympathetic
Warmth	42%	disinterested in others	supportive, helpful
Morality	42%	break/ignore the rules	play by the rules
Pleasantness	42%	aloof or disagreeable	gets along with others
Empathy	46%	out of tune w/ others	in tune with others
Cooperation	82%	competitive, warlike	agreeable, peaceful
Sympathy	70%	socially inconsiderate	socially conscious
Tenderness	34%	cold hearted, selfish	warm hearted, selfless
Nurturance	34%	self pleasing, me first	people pleasing, me last
Conscientiousness	46%	reckless, unscheduled	careful, planner
Efficiency	26%	unreliable, lazy	finisher, follows through
Dutifulness	30%	leisurely, derelict	strict, rule abiding
Purposefulness	30%	inattentive, undisciplined	prepared, focused
Organization	58%	relaxed, oblivious	detail oriented, anal
Cautiousness	42%	impulsive, spendthrift	restrained, cautious
Rationality	70%	irrational, random	direct, logical
Perfectionism	42%	careless, error prone	detail obsessed
Planning	34%	disorganized, random	scheduled, clean
Stability	18%	easily frustrated	calm, cool, unphased
Happiness	38%	unhappy, dissatisfied	self content, positive
Calmness	30%	touchy, volatile	even tempered, tolerant
Moderation	50%	needs instant gratification	easily delays gratification
Toughness	26%	hypersensitive, moody	thick skinned
Impulse Control	46%	lacks self control	maintains composure
Imperturbability	26%	highly emotional	emotionally contained
Cool-headedness	70%	demanding, controlling	accommodating
Tranquility	26%	emotionally volatile	emotionally neutral
Intellect	90%	instinctive, non-analytical	intellectual, analytical
Ingenuity	78%	lacks new ideas	innovative, novel
Reflection	74%	unreflective, coarse	art and beauty lover
Competence	78%	slow to understand/think	intellectual, brainy
Quickness	90%	intellectually dependent	intellectually independent
Introspection	82%	not self reflective	self searching
Creativity	86%	dull headed	synthesizer, iconoclast
Imagination	66%	practical, realistic	dreamer, unrealistic
Depth	78%	lacks curiosity	mental explorer

Here's what I think was inaccurate:
Gregariouasness - I'm not extroverted or shy & reclusive, but I'm not in between either. There are, in my opinion, two types of introversion: a) low-level interacter and b) short-burst interacter. They are using a scale with the first type of introversion contrasted with extroversion. I'm the second type of introvert. I talk a lot and interact a lot when I'm around others, but have a strong need for non-interacting time. So basically my behavior alternates between extreme introvert and fairly extroverted, rarely in between. In my case it's probably because of the on/off nature of many things I do being extended to socializing.
Assertiveness - I have no idea why they think I'm not assertive. It seems like they're confusion cautiousness, assertiveness and need to control others, three separate traits. I'm very assertive, cautious, and not very interested in controlling others (except for my brother sometimes, when I'm overwhelmed).
Leadership - They seem to assume that since I'm not concerned with leading others, I stay in the background. Once again, they are ignoring the third pattern. There are not only leaders and followers, but also non-conformists.
Provocativeness - I don't try to cause trouble for the sake of trouble, but I don't try to avoid conflict either. I base my actions towards others mainly on whether I think it's the right thing to do, not on how they'll react.
Self-Disclosure - For some reason, it says I'm not high on this, even though I've been known to tell people I've just met that I'm autistic, a sexual abuse survivor, or both. Not sure why. Their definition of high self-disclosure sounds like it fits me. Perhaps me and the test had different ideas about what some question meant (kind of like the question "I talk too much". I said it was definately not true of me, because I'm fine with talking a lot, but they probably interpreted that as me not being talkative).
Cooperative - It scores me as high on this. I'm not competitive or warlike, but neither am I "agreeable and peaceful". It seems to be looking on a scale from highly competitive to highly cooperative, and I'm highly independent instead.
Tenderness - Why did it rate that low? I am very caring about the suffering of others. I try to calm my rat Anja down when she's scared by moving little letting her hide, being quiet and not making her the center of attention. Maybe they overgeneralized from my tendency to have little sympathy for people who think you should avoid telling them what you really believe in order to spare their feelings. This test is probably very inaccurate for most activists, because activism is usually a combination of being very empathetic and fighting for what you believe in.
Nurturance - Also inaccurate. I don't put myself ahead of others or others ahead of myself, but they took my saying it was "very innacurate" to describe myself as putting others ahead of myself to mean I put myself ahead of others. I believe I'm no better or worse than anyone else, although how I feel about my worth varies widely.
Efficiency - Why do they equate unreliable and lazy? Those are not the same. Lazy is one end of the extreme, unreliable represents variability. A person who is truly unreliable is lazy sometimes and very hard-working other times, like myself. In my case, it's because of differences in executive functions, the cognitive functions involved in planning and regulating thinking and activity.
Dutifulness - They have the same innacurate assumption I've described so often - considering two traits opposite and thinking everyone can be put on a spectrum of those traits when actually some people are different. I'm not leisurely, derelict, strict or rule-abiding. I think up my own rules to follow rather than automatically following society's rules. I think about whether the rules are correct, and only follow good rules.
Perfectionism - Yet another case of ignoring the third option. The book Strong-Willed Child or Dreamer describes my kind of perfectionism well. That is perfectionism that, rather than being characterized by focusing on details and doing it over again until it's perfect, assumes that either it will be perfect first try or I'll never be good at it and might as well give up now.
On the other hand, this test managed to pick up on my mood swings, creativity and 'need for cognition' alright. Of course, those are areas in which the standard way of having those traits isn't that far different from me.